I have code already that handles absolutely empty comma-separated fields, even if the number of fields does not match the anticipated number of fields, so I should be OK with that. But thanks for pointing out a potential point of failure.
In reply to Re^4: Regex with Backslashes (updated)
by anita2R
in thread Regex with Backslashes
by anita2R
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |