Eily explained this to me in Re^3: Avoiding repeated undefs - very clearly, I thought. Unless I understood him or you. :-)
Regards,
John Davies
In reply to Re: Function Split, bug or error in the documentation?
by davies
in thread Function Split, bug or error in the documentation?
by bojinlund
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |