Eily explained this to me in Re^3: Avoiding repeated undefs - very clearly, I thought. Unless I understood him or you. :-)
Regards,
John Davies
In reply to Re: Function Split, bug or error in the documentation?
by davies
in thread Function Split, bug or error in the documentation?
by bojinlund
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |