It's really bothering me that key players of the community are resorting to more and more vitriol in the discussion. (including <update: names deleted> to name a few)
Why isn't it possible to create a process where
- interest groups are identified
- a common strategy is outlined
- RFCs are formulated with a test suite
- a quality management looks over proof of concept and the implementation
I always thought that my lack of understanding of P5P discussions is due to my limited knowledge.
But I'm certain now that there is a serious and frustrating communication problem which needs to be resolved politically.
And "politically" means a discussion and decision process which is transparent, reliable and efficient.
Probably with mediators channeling the diplomacy and questioning the terminology.
Update
I'm totally pro dispute just in a scientific way, i.e sober and non emotional.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
|
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.