Static HTML is far better because you can unleash things like the kernel web server, which has been clocked at more then 2 times faster than Apache (the kernel server only serves static pages). Then there are the benefits of caching, etc.
____________________
Jeremy
I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.
In reply to Re: Dynamic Web Content- Efficiency
by jepri
in thread Dynamic Web Content- Efficiency
by Superlman
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |