DB<76> sub change { $_[0] = 666 } DB<77> $a=42 DB<78> change($a) DB<79> p $a 666 DB<80> change(42) Modification of a read-only value attempted at (eval 86)[c:/Perl_524/l +ib/perl5db.pl:737] line 2. DB<81>
still "lame"?
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
BUT!!!
DB<81> sub change_arr { $_[0] = [666] } DB<82> $a=[42] DB<83> change_arr($a) DB<84> x $a 0 ARRAY(0x3363180) 0 666 DB<85> change_arr([42]) #NO ERROR??? DB<86>
In reply to Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (UPDATED)
by LanX
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |