This is no answer to my question. My point is: however created, an alias is a reference to something put into a slot of a symbol table entry. I do not see any evidence in your examples against this claim.
UPDATE And then again, a de-referenced reference should behave similar to an alias. AFAICS it does.
Greetings,
-jo
In reply to Re^11: Shouldn't references be readonly?
by jo37
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |