after rereading it, yes this follows my mental model.
Analog to
1; # a readonly temporary scalar $a = 1 ; # $a is a rw copy of the temp scalar
Of course I could be wrong, but I'm still waiting for someone to understand my question...
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly?
by LanX
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |