Put differently, you want to prevent transformation of references, but using a completely ineffective tool to achieve it. Making references read-only doesn't prevent transformation.
Preventing transformation (stringification, numification, but not booleanification) of references might be a good idea.
Issues:
Benefits:
In reply to Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
by ikegami
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |