> "Can't use bareword ("syntactic_sugar") ...".

Well yeah, I guess if those modules are supposed to export functions ° and you call them without parens this might produce bareword errors (and many others).

So declaring a sub syntactic_sugar is already also changing syntax, because it allows to call them as barewords.

Hence you'll need to fake-export them too. ;)

UPDATE

°) or constants, which are actually implemented as functions.

Here the diagnostics https://perldoc.perl.org/perldiag#Can't-use-bareword-(%22%25s%22)-as-%25s-ref-while-%22strict-refs%22-in-use

---

In reply to Re^2: Perl syntax checking without `perl -c` (bareword) by LanX
in thread Perl syntax checking without `perl -c` by kcott

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

---

Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!

Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.

Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.

Please read these before you post! —

• How do I compose an effective node title?
• How do I post a question effectively?
• Markup in the Monastery

Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:

a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr

You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)

	For:		Use:
	&		&
	<		&lt;
	>		&gt;
	[		&#91;
	]		&#93;

Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?

See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.