LWP::UserAgent is full-featured but slow. HTTP::Tiny follows the ::Tiny design rules and offers almost all the same functionality in a much lighter faster package. Furl is even faster.
When building high-use API clients I choose between full-featured and really fast. For everything else (scripts, low-use clients, etc.) I use the core module.
Hope this helps!
In reply to Re: LWP::Simple vs HTTP::Tiny
by 1nickt
in thread LWP::Simple vs HTTP::Tiny
by Bod
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |