While these regex libraries are useful, I don't think I can fold them directly into a Marpa DSL definiton. From what I can tell, I can only use individial character classes, and would have to comprise a number of lexeme tokens to match the relative complexity of the IPv4 (and especially IPv6) expressions.
In my more-specific application, I am indeed intending to validate the IPs externally -- probably with Net::IP. To that end, I may well alter the DSL just to accept NAME, and lay off the exact semantics to a subroutine with an if (is_ip4(...) { ... } elsif (is_ip6(...) { ... } else { assume_hostname(...) } flavour.
Thanks for looking in...
J.
In reply to Re^2: Cannot get Marpa::R2 to prioritise one rule over another
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Cannot get Marpa::R2 to prioritise one rule over another
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |