Thanks for demonstrating how to recompose the dotted components of hostnames and IPs, using a custom action. I had been wondering how best to go about that, and you have given me a starting point.
One question, regarding your concat subroutine, if I may: Is it possible to generalise it to return the [rulename,concatted-string] pair, so it conforms to the tokens emitted by the default action [name,values], or would I have to have a separate subroutine for each rule (and return the rulename literally)?
I had originally thought there might be context in first argument, which you shift over, but that appears to be an empty hashref in all cases I've seen.
In reply to Re^3: Cannot get Marpa::R2 to prioritise one rule over another
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Cannot get Marpa::R2 to prioritise one rule over another
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |