"I didn't even try running it because it has the bareword of udp there which I'm pretty sure is illegal?"
So you found two documentation "typos". One was a reading comprehension and instruction following issue on your part, the other was a lack of testing or investigation.
The examples in the IO::Socket::INET documentation are not run under strict, so a bareword is completely legal and legitimate. Not only that, it appears as though you changed the excerpt, so it's not even an authentic example from their documentation.
blah(bareword); sub blah { my $word = shift; print "$word\n"; }
Output:
bareword
In reply to Re: What do you do with typos in the documentation?
by stevieb
in thread What do you do with typos in the documentation?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |