Yes, and Perl introduce and and or as low precedence alternatives.
> The long discussion
yes we had this before
simple example
DB<226> p do { unless (42) { } } 42 DB<227>
Please keep in mind that "ternary operator" is not correct either, since it's a mathematical term classifying a whole family of operators with 3 operands. ? : is just the only ternary one in these languages.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re^6: Situation where warning "Found = in conditional, should be" seems obsolete (documentation - C terminology)
by LanX
in thread Situation where warning "Found = in conditional, should be" seems obsolete
by rsFalse
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |