I believe that Radiola is correct that fields was intended as an interface to pseudo-hashes. I remember documentation urging the use of fields because it was specifically intended as a forwards-compatible interface that would still work after pseudo-hashes were removed.
Pseudo-hashes seem to have been recognized as a bad idea almost as soon as they were implemented.
You are also correct that fields has nothing to do with object methods; Radiola is confused on this point, although the documentation is also confusing here, since fields is documented in OO terms.
In reply to Re^5: do separate hashes share common keys?
by jcb
in thread do separate hashes share common keys?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |