Consider passing named parameters to find and add. That way your existing hash ref gets passed in as a hash with no other change, but a simple find doesn't need to have a hash ref spun up.
Thank you - I don't know why I didn't do it exactly like that because most of the time it will be a hash, not a hashref that gets passed in. Except there are a lot of parameters which could change...hence why I read the table columns out of the information_schema in the new method.
In reply to Re^2: [RFC] Review of module code and POD
by Bod
in thread [RFC] Review of module code and POD
by Bod
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |