I don't care about 'no strict'.
Solutions are available by parsing the optree like demonstrated in B::Xref B::Concise and B::Deparse
But patching them means reinventing the wheel, which I tried to avoid.
> I'm not sure I agree
I had the discussion here not long ago. The perldocs are contradictory since our was introduced.
Lexical is a term borrowed from lisp for variables which have no dynamic scope, but only in the readable block.(lexical ~ like written)
You know I'm picky about terminology, calling my "private" and package vars "public" would have been better.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
See also Re^3: Unusual variable declaration ff
In reply to Re^4: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?
by LanX
in thread PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |