Here some "alternative" facts: ²
Let's put this into relation with your alleged "top-monk" (which I respect nevertheless)
But well ... this doesn't prove that I'm not saying foolish things from time to time ...
So please show me those threads where I stated anything like ...
> "That really shouldn't be allowed"
... without giving plenty of evidence, links and even example code?
I think I also tend to reply to every new argument without resorting to a cheap "you know I'm kidding"
According to your "statistic" this should be an easy game ...
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
°) eyepopslikeamosquito can tell you more about it. Ask yourself, how comes 30% of the top 20 saints haven't been here for years without loosing rank?
And one also gets XP for voting, which makes it even more complicated.
²) NB: this isn't adjusted to the deflation over the years, because that's not easily done. But it was always consensus that "XP is only a game" anyway.
³) he barely passed your 1000 posts minimum, because he has only 10% of my volume. But if you look at my 54th best post you'll see a reputation of 40 and his 506th only at 16.
For more How to Lie with Statistics
In reply to Re^13: "" but true (how to lie with statistics)
by LanX
in thread "" but true
by Chuma
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |