OK I guess the point is in the bidirectional arrow.
Classical ORM is limited by the fact that it's mapping unidirectionally object language -> relational language.
Ribasushi's title seems to indicate that he can also map all relational semantic back, hence <->
Not sure if that kind of cleverness in the title is good marketing.
🤔
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re: Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
by LanX
in thread Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |