I've always thought that since DBIx::Class Maps an Object-oritented data structure to a Relational database, it's an ORM :-)
Uh-oh... I always found it easy to map an existing relational database to DBIx::Class objects using the DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader and, also often cumbersome to map my object structures to a RDBMS if it wasn't designed for a relational database in the first place.
In reply to Re^2: Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
by haj
in thread Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |