Simple rule: when you have data, think database. I don't care if it's mysql, postgres, Db2, sqlite, but use a db.
In this particular case, especially, you'll probably find it runs faster to load the data, ask the db to give you the output, and discard the db than it is to try to do it in memory. Databases are often optimised for this type of data access, and will be a much more efficient (time-wise especially) use of disk than swapping / paging. Sqlite probably will suffice, but, if not, mysql and postgres are free, and not difficult to install on most linux distros, and not really much harder on Windows, even without WSL.
I know, you asked a perl question, and there's not a lick of perl in this answer. But the reality is that while you can do this in any turing-complete language, you still should use the right tool for the job, and, in this case, a database is that right tool.
In reply to Re: efficient perl code to count, rank
by Tanktalus
in thread efficient perl code to count, rank
by Perl_Noob2021
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |