Ironically, you might reduce the efficiency of the compression, because you have squeezed out the "redundancy" upon which text compression algorithms depend. Simply stated, these algorithms recognize "a sequence that we have recently seen before," and replace them with a coded reference to that sequence. Your pre-processing might remove that redundancy, reducing or even eliminating the chance to substitute codes. However, there's really only one way to find out: an empirical test. Generate a few thousand bits of plausibly representative data (unless you have the real stuff at hand), and try it both ways.

In reply to Re: How to efficently pack a string of 63 characters by Anonymous Monk
in thread How to efficently pack a string of 63 characters by baxy77bax

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.