See http://www.zlib.net/feldspar.html
The only chance to improve zip is to compress redundancy which isn't found by zip while providing an input which is character based (which you are doing)
That's why I suggested a line delta compression first in my other answer, provided the example was real (which is not a given with this OP)
See Re: How to efficently pack a string of 63 characters
(There is a chance tho that zip is clever enough to notice such repeating groups too. But that kind of stuff is normally part of image not text compression)
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re^2: How to efficently pack a string of 63 characters
by LanX
in thread How to efficently pack a string of 63 characters
by baxy77bax
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |