I tried two extended double versions of given loop: __float80 (hardware) and __float128 (software emulation). The results were, respectively:
1141973130132393144424071168.000000 1141973130132392916052606976.000000Difference in speed -- about 60-fold. ps. would you mind stating the mathematically correct result (say, to six digits after decimal point)?
In reply to Re^2: Decimal Floating Point (DFP) and does Perl needs DFP?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Decimal Floating Point (DFP) and does Perl needs DFP?
by flexvault
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |