> That's a joke right?

Yes. I'm not aware of any authentic Performance Appraisals of Albert Einstein, Patent Clerk. If you know of any (especially in German) please let us know! :)

> He didn't even receive the Nobel Prize for his Relativity Theories.
> They were still so disputed at the time (1921/22), that only the Photoelectric Effect was mentioned.

This remains a mystery! I don't think Special Relativity was anything special (pun intended ;) - after the failure of the Michelson-Morley experiment, and the earlier works of Lorentz and Poincare, it was ripe to be found. If Einstein hadn't found it in 1905, someone else would surely have done so within the next few years.

General Relativity is in a completely different ball park - if Einstein hadn't concocted it back then, we may still not know of it today!

Einstein, a notoriously ordinary mathematician, struggled with the mathematics of General Relativity for eight long years following the 'happiest thought of his life'. By contrast, the World's leading mathematician David Hilbert found a solution within weeks of Einstein giving a series of lectures at the University of Gottingen in 1915. See also: History of general relativity and General relativity priority dispute.

Back then the Nobel prize was traditionally awarded for Experimental rather than Theoretical physics. The politics and opinions of the individuals on the Nobel committee was undoubtedly a factor too. It seems we will never know the real reasons.

From Why didnt Einsteins Nobel prize mention relativity-theory? (stackexchange question):

Einstein's most original contribution to physics was General Relativity Theory, as Lorentz and Poincare already laid the foundations of Special Relativity. It is often said that the reason why Einstein's Nobel Prize didn't mention Relativity Theory is the lack of sufficient evidence to the theory of relativity by 1922. But actually, by 1922, the special theory of relativity had been tested for almost all its major and pivotal predictions. The general theory of relativity had passed many highly significant tests with extreme precision. Like the deflection of light rays or the precession of the perihelion of the Mercury. It should be noted that although the precession of the perihelion of the Mercury was known before the formulation of the theory, GR was not an ad hoc explanation for the same--and thus, the fact of precession should be regarded as a verified prediction of GR. So, the absence of the mention of the Relativity Theory remains a curious question.

In reply to Re^2: Organizational Culture (Part VII): Science by eyepopslikeamosquito
in thread Organizational Culture (Part VII): Science by eyepopslikeamosquito

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.