"I agree with afoken that an uniform global handle_error doesn't solve the need to define an ad-hoc catch condition."
My response may (or may not) alter your view on that. If it's not suitable for your needs, that's fine: as I said, "Just throwing a few ideas around.".
On the try/catch in 5.34, I generally don't use or suggest experimental features; in fact, I normally only mention them when recommending not to use them. In this instance, you had said, "... new syntax ... experimentally implemented ..."; accordingly, I pointed out a core experimental feature (in the certain knowledge that you're smart enough to understand the pitfalls) — I actually don't know if what you're doing is purely academic or for a production system.
— Ken
In reply to Re^3: conditional catch-blocks 'try {} catch(COND) { }'
by kcott
in thread conditional catch-blocks 'try {} catch(COND) { }'
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |