Tye, I must have not understood your proposal in the chatterbox. My apologies. This is good and I could use it on a case by case basis. I don't know 100% that I will always see the same line but I can substitute a different regex if necessary. I'm hoping this is just a rare occurrence and I will know more as I work with these files on a more regular basis.
I was hoping there was some kind of exception handling that could catch this kind of error and move on. Though I know this goes against the XML doctrine on poorly formed XML
In reply to Re^4: Ignoring not well-formed (invalid token) errors (pipeline)
by brettski
in thread Ignoring not well-formed (invalid token) errors
by brettski
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |