Go to hell. I am disgusted that someone should try to talk about this subject unknown, anonymously.
Let's keep the choice absolutely free.
Edit: struck 'abusiveness' in view of apparent sensitivities. I actually have to guess as to which part would be 'abusive'. It wasn't abuse, of course. It was a way on my part to make clear that a dialogue on this subject with a void persona is not possible.
In short, I think it's OK that that got -12 downvotes but what reflects badly on the monks is that it actually garnered any reap-votes. Getting a bit too sensitive, aren't we? So I really hope those reap-votes were directed at me personally and not about the subject or, even worse, about the wording.
In reply to Re^3: what are the rules regarding homenode image, what is inappropriate?
by erix
in thread what are the rules regarding homenode image, what is inappropriate?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |