I believe you have taken my comment about "::" completely out of context. You wrote "package ::" which is very obscure — I actually don't think I've seen it previously — for $work, I'd expect "package main", which is common and generally understood.
"So why do you expect me to use %main:: instead of %::?"
I've no idea where that comes from. I did not voice such an expectation of you or anyone else.
"Also, using Foo::->method ..."
Again, I've no idea where that comes from; it wasn't mentioned in my post. In fact, I encourage the use of "::->" over just "->".
"That was not mentioned in the question."
My reply to you had "As mentioned, ...".
"And you're not the only person using PerlMonks."
Why write that?
— Ken
In reply to Re^4: Is there an official regex for checking module names?
by kcott
in thread Is there an official regex for checking module names?
by kcott
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |