I've no idea where that comes from.
You said using package :: wouldn't pass review. («I'm familiar with "::" but it wouldn't pass code review») So it means that %:: wouldn't pass review.
Again, I've no idea where that comes from; it wasn't mentioned in my post.
True, but you said :: and aaaa::::::bbbb wouldn't pass review, so I extrapolated that Foo:: wouldn't either.
Why write that?
The comment to which I replied assumed replies to your posts are only for your benefit.
My reply to you had "As mentioned, ...".
And I said that that this is irrelevant. Not everything is about you. You asked how to check if something is legitimate package name, and that was an important part of that.
In reply to Re^5: Is there an official regex for checking module names?
by ikegami
in thread Is there an official regex for checking module names?
by kcott
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |