OK, after a second coffee I finally got my had wrapped around it.
Definition/Interpretation matters:
The random pick $r between from 0..N-1 represents what the voter $r has chosen.
Hence order doesn't matter as long as it is fixed, since a 100 wide interval will always have the same probability of 100/550, no matter where it occurs.˛
But I don't see any intuitive way to invert this interpretation, because $r has not-voted to all other choices.
Assigning "inverted" votes like suggested in your other post might work, as long as they sum up to 550 again°. But the question of the weighting factor and distribution will come up again.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
°) respectively N' is corrected.
˛) IOW no matter if voters John and Jim swapped their place, their probability to be chosen stays the same.
In reply to Re^4: Randomly choosing from a set of alternatives with varying popularity
by LanX
in thread Randomly choosing from a set of alternatives with varying popularity
by ibm1620
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |