I guess "pre-Modern" means Windows 3.1, April 6, 1992?
Nope. All DOS versions back to at least 2.0 (March 1983) supported both forward and backslashes in paths. Using the backslash was more or less just a convention, partially enforced by programs using the forward slash to indicate an option (instead of a path). But the switch character could be changed from DOS 2.0 up to 3.31 to something else, and so the forward slash could have been used in paths even on the command line (see Re^6: moving from mac to PC -- win internal commands). The DOS API functions (i.e. int 0x21) always accepted both forward and backslashes.
DOS 1.x had no subdirectories and thus did not need and did not use forward or backslashes. Each (floppy) drive had exactly one directory, the root directory, and thus it was sufficient to prefix a filename with the drive letter and a colon to get an absolute path.
Alexander
In reply to Re^5: What is the meaning of this line in Perl on linux?
by afoken
in thread What is the meaning of this line in Perl on linux?
by Anonymous Monk
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |