In fact, this is what Perl optimizes the above statement to:

You have it backwards. «and» isn't optimized into an «if». There isn't even an «if» opcode. An «if» statement is compiled into code that includes an «and» or an «or» opcode.

$ perl -MO=Concise,-exec -e'f() and g()' 1 <0> enter v 2 <;> nextstate(main 1 -e:1) v:{ 3 <0> pushmark s 4 <#> gv[*f] s/EARLYCV 5 <1> entersub[t2] sKS/TARG 6 <|> and(other->7) vK/1 7 <0> pushmark s 8 <#> gv[*g] s/EARLYCV 9 <1> entersub[t4] vKS/TARG a <@> leave[1 ref] vKP/REFC -e syntax OK $ perl -MO=Concise,-exec -e'g() if f()' 1 <0> enter v 2 <;> nextstate(main 1 -e:1) v:{ 3 <0> pushmark s 4 <#> gv[*f] s/EARLYCV 5 <1> entersub[t4] sKS/TARG 6 <|> and(other->7) vK/1 7 <0> pushmark s 8 <#> gv[*g] s/EARLYCV 9 <1> entersub[t2] vKS/TARG a <@> leave[1 ref] vKP/REFC -e syntax OK $ perl -MO=Concise,-exec -e'if (f()) { g() }' 1 <0> enter v 2 <;> nextstate(main 1 -e:1) v:{ 3 <0> pushmark s 4 <#> gv[*f] s/EARLYCV 5 <1> entersub[t2] sKS/TARG 6 <|> and(other->7) vK/1 7 <0> pushmark s 8 <#> gv[*g] s/EARLYCV 9 <1> entersub[t4] vKS/TARG a <@> leave[1 ref] vKP/REFC -e syntax OK

«f() and g()» and «g() if f()» generate exactly the same opcode tree, so Deparse outputs what it thinks is clearest.[1]

If the whole conditional expression is negated, the «not» and the «and» opcodes will be optimized into an «or».

$ perl -MO=Concise,-exec -e'if (!f()) { g() }' 1 <0> enter v 2 <;> nextstate(main 1 -e:1) v:{ 3 <0> pushmark s 4 <#> gv[*f] s/EARLYCV 5 <1> entersub[t2] sKS/TARG 6 <|> or(other->7) vK/1 7 <0> pushmark s 8 <#> gv[*g] s/EARLYCV 9 <1> entersub[t4] vKS/TARG a <@> leave[1 ref] vKP/REFC -e syntax OK

  1. «-exec» shows the code that's executed. And while the code executed for «if (f()) { g() }» is identical to the code executed for the other two, the opcode tree is different. There are vestiges in the opcode tree of which Deparse can take advantage to differentiate the «if (f()) { g() }» case from the others. Remove «,-exec» to see the tree.

In reply to Re^2: Purpose of =~ and = in this statement by ikegami
in thread Purpose of =~ and = in this statement by sherab

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.