G'day LittleJack,
I've seen that notation before. I'm reasonably sure it's the same as described in "Moose::Util::TypeConstraints - Default Type Constraints".
The author of Types::Standard, tobyink,
may be along later to shed further light on this.
Update: Although, he hasn't been seen prowling the cloisters in the last few months.
— Ken
In reply to Re: Unusual style of documentation?
by kcott
in thread Unusual style of documentation?
by LittleJack
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |