It is always an option, yes. I have mostly found that cpanm fits my needs more but this is the sort of very useful feature which would make me look again at old cpan. Thanks for bringing this up.
🦛
In reply to Re^2: Detecting failures easily/obviously with cpanm
by hippo
in thread Detecting failures easily/obviously with cpanm
by hippo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |