Even for a trivial action I think it is worth it because at some point in the future something about that particular process will change and possibly in a way that might not be supported by one of the "simpler" modules
Interesting...
This is not a selection criterion I had considered but it totally makes sense.
A few times I have created something using LWP::Simple, that used to be my go to web module, only to have to change to LWP:UserAgent later on because I needed to access or set something that wasn't available using LWP::Simple. More recently I have generally used HTTP::Tiny but for no other reason than it being core. That in itself is not a good enough reason for anything that doesn't need to be portable as both the LWP modules are installed on my system.
In reply to Re^2: Choosing the right module
by Bod
in thread Choosing the right module
by Bod
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |