Do you see a viable reason why someone should get a gratification for casting hundreds of votes week after week on old nodes?
I'm not sure why you would ask me that question. Was there anything in my post to suggest I believe someone should get such gratification?
A rule only makes sense if it can be enforced.
That's a separate problem. It's also the real problem, and the one worth focusing on.
I can think of many ways to disguise such votes as legitimate. ... I think it's much easier to limit the exploit instead of implementing a surveillance apparatus to hunt down the culprits.
It is not unusual that addressing a symptom is easier than addressing an underlying problem.
I think there are a variety of patterns of behaviour that could easily be detected and flagged for a closer look. If code were implemented to detect such patterns, I do not think it would be beneficial to publicise the details; I am in two minds about whether it would be beneficial to publicise its existence.
In reply to Re^6: Notification of XP increase has gone wild (maybe)
by hv
in thread Notification of XP increase has gone wild (maybe)
by davido
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |