I agree with the LanX on the terminology here ... as I did last time. ;-) I think Wikipedia agrees too:
In reply to Re^4: What's the point of this 'overload' idiom?
by eyepopslikeamosquito
in thread What's the point of this 'overload' idiom?
by Cody Fendant
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |