This node has been considered for reaping. The reason given is:
"earlier duplicate of Re: Is there a concerted effort to break CPAN for older perl versions to drive support for v7? (the second has additional text, so reap this earlier node)"
Those two final paragraphs are different; one does not simply represent "additional text".
It would make sense to merge those two different paragraphs into one of the nodes, then reap the other node.
At this point, I'm not voting "reap" on either node.
Edit (afterthought): I think the consideration should be removed until the issue I've described is resolved.
— Ken
In reply to Re^2: Is there a concerted effort to break CPAN for older perl versions to drive support for v7? [on "reap" consideration]
by kcott
in thread Is there a concerted effort to break CPAN for older perl versions to drive support for v7?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |