Could you provide us with details why? Does this rule list an author or references?
PBP is quite old already, many things could have changed in the meantime.
And this wording "buggy and slow" doesn't sound like the tone in PBP...
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re: Readonly vs ReadonlyX
by LanX
in thread Readonly vs ReadonlyX
by rlauer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |