First of all, it would be simpler to avoid misleading the user by using a hack to circumvent strictures.
sub input_pin { my $name = sprintf( "Device::BCM2835::RPI_V2_GPIO_P1_%02d", $_[0] ) +; no strict "refs"; return $name->(); }
But consider the following version:
my @input_pin; for ( @Device::BCM2835::EXPORT_OK ) { next if !/^RPI_V2_GPIO_P1_(\d+)\z/; my $pin = 0 + $1; my $val = do { no strict "refs"; "Device::BCM2835::$_"->() }; $input_pin[ $pin ] = $val; }
This version allows us to do
$input_pin[3] $input_pin[5] $input_pin[7] ...
instead of the slower
input_pin(3) input_pin(5) input_pin(7)
So what if it's not the simplest?
Update: The point of the first half is that using no strict version is simpler, but it originally said the opposite! woops. And sprintf was misspelled.
In reply to Re^2: How to make a variable in hard call.
by ikegami
in thread How to make a variable in hard call.
by Konan
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |