>> "... under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself."
This looks strained (for want of a better word). I'd remove the word "system"; and consider whether I even want "itself".
Good point...
I wasn't sure if changing the wording of licence agreements was a good idea as I have no idea how much "legal rigour" they have been subjected to. I didn't write that but rather chose it from the options available within Module::Starter
I see you have 't/pod.t' with Test::Pod which should pick up typos
I noticed those as well but haven't touched them as I don't understand them and note that publishing the module works without altering them. Again, they were added by Module::Starter.
First, I want to get the module published, available and usable...then I will (hopefully) get a better understanding of how I can improve the details and the system for creating and publishing modules so that future ones will be better.
Seems like the POD tests need to be looked at first :)
In reply to Re^2: RFC - Documentation Review
by Bod
in thread Please review documentation of my AI::Embedding module
by Bod
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |