This was actually intentional as it looks better
But the whole question is about nested loops. By changing the code to look different, you completely missed the point.
In reply to Re^4: postfix "for" question?
by ikegami
in thread postfix "for" question?
by misterperl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |