Interesting. I guess they can't blame me for this, as I haven't released my Thai module yet! (However, I have no idea why or how such an error could occur simply with the use of \p{...} characters in one's regex--how can a unicode property definition be illegal?)
For what it's worth, I discovered that my nomenclature for the \p{...} characters was illegal--but they never produced an error message like that...they just didn't work, as if they had not been defined or imported. I learned that there are only two possibilities with names of unicode properties:
\p{InProperty} \p{IsProperty}
Using something like '\p{Property}' is illegal--it must be prefixed by either "In" or by "Is" or Perl will not accept it or recognize it.
But the error shown here in the OP doesn't appear to have much to do with this, leaving me to wonder what it is for.
Blessings,
~Polyglot~
In reply to Re: THREE new perl releases
by Polyglot
in thread THREE new perl releases
by Tux
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |