Hi Monks,
to use a constant defined constant as a hash key it is a common notation to write $hash{+CONST}. But why does it not work if I use the '+' notation to literally specify a hash? Example:
This prints:use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dumper; $Data::Dumper::Sortkeys = 1; use constant FOO => 'the FOO key'; my %h1 = ( +FOO => "the value" , FOO_const => FOO); my %h2 = ( FOO , "the value", FOO => "other value"); # comma my @a = ( +FOO, FOO); print(Dumper(\%h1, \%h2, \@a), $h2{+FOO}, "\n");
Surprisingly, the +FOO in the initialization of %h1 is turned to the string 'FOO'. Yes, i can use the standard comma or (FOO) =>... instead, but i would like to understand why the '+' notation does not work as expected when used left to a fat comma.$VAR1 = { 'FOO' => 'the value', 'FOO_const' => 'the FOO key' }; $VAR2 = { 'FOO' => 'other value', 'the FOO key' => 'the value' }; $VAR3 = [ 'the FOO key', 'the FOO key' ]; the value
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |