As with all lvalue context operations, the rational is that it must exist so you can assign to it (e.g. $$a = 123;)
Except not quite. Cause the element is evaluated in lvalue context in both for (@a) and f(@a) as well. So why don't they replace the NULL with a scalar?
That's cause they create and return a proxy scalar containing a reference to the array and the index. Using magic, accesses to this scalar access the original array element.
$ perl -MDevel::Peek -e'sub { Dump($_[0]) }->( $a[0] )' SV = PVLV(0x558b3a14b8a0) at 0x558b3a0f4538 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (GMG,SMG) <- Get and set magic IV = 0 NV = 0 PV = 0 MAGIC = 0x558b3a119460 MG_VIRTUAL = &PL_vtbl_defelem MG_TYPE = PERL_MAGIC_defelem(y) TYPE = y TARGOFF = 0 <- index TARGLEN = 1 TARG = 0x558b3a1241d8 <- array FLAGS = 0 SV = PVAV(0x558b3a0f6868) at 0x558b3a1241d8 REFCNT = 2 FLAGS = () ARRAY = 0x0 FILL = -1 MAX = -1 FLAGS = (REAL)
Creating this proxy for \ would cause issues.
In reply to Re^8: Using exists to check element in array (existence-by-reference for hashes too)
by ikegami
in thread Using exists to check element in array
by david
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |