Now in theory it could happen that you have an array of a handful elements and after 1 million combined push and shift operations it allocates megabytes of space while not logically growing. ... I doubt this happens
That's my position also. And I was bored, so here's the proof.
#!/usr/bin/env perl #===================================================================== +========== # # FILE: fifo-mem.pl # # USAGE: ./fifo-mem.pl # # DESCRIPTION: Test memory consumption of a push/shift FIFO # See https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=11157497 # #===================================================================== +========== use strict; use warnings; use Memory::Usage; my @fifo; my $max = 100_000_000; my $mu = Memory::Usage->new; $mu->record ('start'); for my $count (1 .. $max) { push @fifo, 'dog'; shift @fifo; $mu->record ("After $count iterations") unless $count % 10_000_000 +; } $mu->record ('finish'); $mu->dump;
And since not everyone can run this, here's the output:
$ time vsz ( diff) rss ( diff) shared ( diff) code ( dif +f) data ( diff) 0 10780 ( 10780) 6544 ( 6544) 5448 ( 5448) 4 ( 4) + 1356 ( 1356) start 3 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 10000000 iterations 5 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 20000000 iterations 8 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 30000000 iterations 10 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 40000000 iterations 12 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 50000000 iterations 15 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 60000000 iterations 17 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 70000000 iterations 20 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 80000000 iterations 22 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 90000000 iterations 24 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) After 100000000 iterations 24 10780 ( 0) 6544 ( 0) 5448 ( 0) 4 ( 0) + 1356 ( 0) finish $
As expected, no leak whatsoever.
It could also be an issue if the OS doesn't "take back" released memory.
Of course, but so could any program doing anything. That doesn't constitute a leak.
🦛
In reply to Re^3: How to implement a Queue that doesn't leak memory?
by hippo
in thread How to implement a Queue that doesn't leak memory?
by Anonymous Monk
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |