So it turns out I'm a goof (this is not surprising), and after posting here, ruminating, and digging through the FreeTDS code, my brain proposed another solution. If I can't have multiple statement handles for a single database handle, can I have multiple database handles, each with its own statement handle? I should try that, right? The solution couldn't be that obvious, right? RIGHT?
Good grief. I just tried it, and it works. I just created two $dbh guys, each with their own $sth; they each called my good friend fetchrow_hashref, and it all went swimmingly.
I understand this is called Rubber Duck Debugging. Now it's time for some Scotch to celebrate. You goofball.
In reply to Re^4: DBD::ODBC and FreeTDS / limited to one statement handle
by talexb
in thread DBD::ODBC and FreeTDS / limited to one statement handle
by talexb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |