ikegami most probably wants to point out the fact that, with a 'Q' specifier, 0xFFFF_FFFF will give a different result.
While you are certainly right that for "all F's" it is easier to write "one short of overflow", hence "-1", he is certainly right in pointing out that simply going from 0xFFFF_FFFF to 0xFFFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFF may be an incorrect oversimplification.
In reply to Re^9: Why is pack("N",42949672965) giving me 00 00 00 05
by soonix
in thread Why is pack("N",42949672965) giving me 00 00 00 05
by isync
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |