My first guess would be autovivification: $h{$_} behaves differently in lvalue and rvalue contexts,...
True, but currently the usage of X // Y as an lvalue results in a compile error. I'm not sure if this is any different in overloading.
Update:
One overlooked detail:
Also any classes that provide overloading of these operators...
Logical operators cannot be overloaded.
Greetings,
🐻
In reply to Re^2: Logical/defined or as lvalue
by jo37
in thread Logical/defined or as lvalue
by jo37
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |